Saturday, February 25, 2012

Mitt Trotsky And RuPaul: The New Axis of Evil

As has been reported by Rush Limbaugh and Mark Levin, there's an alliance of sorts between Mitt Romney (aka---Mitt Trotsky) and Ron Paul (aka---RuPaul, Jew hater Ron Paul, Dr. Demento, Crazy Uncle Ron, Iran Paul, and Dr. Newsletter). In other words, Mittiots like Ann Coulter and Matt Drudge are now marching under RuPaul's Swastika, while Paultards like Screwy Lewy Rockwell are now marching under Trotsky's Hammer and Sickle. (Poland is very, very nervous right now.)

In the past 20 debates, RuPaul and Mitt Trotsky have never had one cross word for each other, while both attacked every Conservative that dared to oppose them. The first victim was Michele Bachmann, and they succeeded in driving the brave CONgresswoman from the race. Next was Herman Cain and Rick Perry. Now, Newt Gingrich and Rick Santorum are being targeted by the blitzkrieg of distortions, lies, and ridiculous accusations that come from the Trotsky and RuPaul camps.

Why would that be ?

From the Washington Compost:

***********************************

"Despite deep differences on a range of issues, Romney and Paul became friends in 2008, the last time both ran for president. So did their wives, Ann Romney and Carol Paul. The former Massachusetts governor compliments the Texas congressman during debates, praising Paul’s religious faith during the last one in Jacksonville, Florida. Immediately afterward, as is often the case, the Pauls and the Romneys gravitated toward one another to say hello.

The Romney-Paul alliance is more than a curious connection. It is a strategic partnership: for Paul, an opportunity to gain a seat at the table if his long-shot bid for the presidency fails; for Romney, a chance to gain support from one of the most vibrant subgroups within the Republican Party."

 http://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/for-paul-and-romney-a-strategic-alliance-between-outsider-and-establishment/2012/01/20/gIQAf8foiQ_story.html

***********************************

Well, there's one theory. Rand Paul, Dr. Newsletter's son and Imperial Senator from Kentucky, has stated that he would be "honored" if he was asked by Mitt Trotsky to become the Veep candidate. Another theory, first proposed by Mark Levin, states that Iran Paul knows the game is over and that an alliance between him and Mitt Trotsky might give him some sort of prime time speech at the Republican convention before he retires to Teheran.

Here's the actual reason: Both are progressives who want to destroy the Conservative Movement probably as much they want to defeat Chairman Obama.

Both Mitt Trotsky and RuPaul have had their problems with Conservative thought. Take a look-see at their attitude toward Ronald Reagan and his Vice President George Bush (Yes, I know neither Bush I or Bush II are Conservatives.) for example:

***********************************






***********************************

Of course, this is just the tip of the iceberg when it comes to Mitt Trotsky and RuPaul. Neither one is particularly pro-life, and both are extremely weak when it comes to stopping the immoral and evil (yes, evil) homosexual "rights" agenda. These views are basically cultural Marxism, and are calling cards of the Progressivik Horde. Of course, there are the matters of Romneycare(less) and RuPaul's McGovernite foreign policy, which are also anti-Conservative (and not mention, un-American), but enough electrons have died needless deaths on that crap. We all know both Romneycare(less) and RuPaul's foreign policy are waaaaaaay outside of the boundries of Conservative thought, regardless of what Tokyo Rove and Pat Pukechanan would have you believe.

Back when Glenn Beck was still cool (and not attacking Newt Gingrich for stupid reasons) he would compare the state of beloved Republic with the Weimar Republic. It turns out that Beck was right. We have become the Weimar Republic. Just like the Weimar Republic, we have the Marxists (Chairman Obama and his drones), the Nazis (RuPaul and his Brownshirts), and the Socialists (Mitt Trotsky and his Useful Idiots) vying for power. Well, that didn't end well for the Weimar Republic, and it won't end well for us, either, if we allow this new Axis of Evil to continue to beat down Conservatives.


God help us all.

Friday, February 24, 2012

Who Didn't See This Coming ?

click to enlarge
http://www.arabamericannews.com/news/index.php?mod=article&cat=Election&article=5325

Sunday, January 29, 2012

Daddy Grizzlies Are Dangerous, Too

A couple of the folks who have read my diatribes against traitor Ron Paul have asked me, "Why is it so personal with you ? What's your deal ?" Well, the answer is pretty easy.


My son.


My son (who will remain nameless for obvious reasons) is everything a father could hope for in a little boy. He plays Little League. He loves comic books. (He thinks we should elect Captain America as president.) Like his father was many moons ago, he's the class clown who hates math. In short, my son is your average little boy who has a frog in his pocket and a smile that would even make an IRS audit seem fun.

And yet, the vast majority of the mutants who follow Ron Paul hate this little boy.

Why ?

Well, that's easy. He's Jewish.

You see, when the Paultards wander around the internet spewing their Jew hating filth, I don't get angry for myself. After all, I'm an adult who's more than capable of taking care of himself. The way I see it, when Paultards attack Jews, they're attacking my little boy, who, at least check, has never harmed a soul. (I can't even get the kid to go fishing with me because he feels bad for the fish.)

How am I not supposed to take this personally ? How am I not supposed wonder out loud why Ron Paul hasn't distanced himself from this vile behavior ? Why should I look the other way ? Because Ron Paul says the magic words of "smaller, limited govenment" (which he's done zilch to promote, by the way), I should pretend that all is well ?

Fat chance. I intend to make sure Ron Paul becomes a meaningless footnote in American history. I will actively campaign against this whack job and his detestable lieutenants with every fiber of my being. I won't stop until Paul concedes and retires to Islamo-Nazi Iran.


Mama Grizzlies aren't the only ones who will defend their cubs. Daddy Grizzlies are pretty darn tough, too.


Saturday, January 7, 2012

"Only Ron Paul.....Ron Paul Is the Only....."

When one chooses to waste his valuable time on God's green (and not to mention cooling) earth by speaking to a Paultard, without fail, the following words will be spoken or typed:


"Only Ron Paul....."


"Ron Paul is the only....."


The above lines are usually followed with an absurd claim, like "Only Ron Paul understands the Constitution!" or "Ron Paul is the only Republican candidate who can break Wayne Gretzky's scoring records while teaching Gordon Ramsay how to cook!". (Some of the more hardcore cultists would never take their political savior's name in vain and only refer to the old Jew hater as "Dr. Paul". Yes, that's as creepy as it sounds.) This is always my cue to go into Verbal Assault Mode. To me, nonsensical rambling like this is like Wolverine's claws against Glenn Beck's chalkboard at its best and narcotics-induced insanity at its worst. I can tolerate a whole lot of things, but attempts by a mental deficient to spread vapid propaganda are not among them.

However, today is different. Today, I'm feeling intellectually lazy. In fact, I feel so intellectually lazy that I'm going to lower myself and use Paultardspeak. Ready ? Here we go:

  • Only Ron Paul is mentally ill enough to think Iran should have nuclear weapons.
  • Ron Paul is the only Republican candidate who voted to repeal Don't Ask, Don't Tell.
  • Only Ron Paul thinks traditional marriage shouldn't be defended by a Constitutional amendment.
  • Ron Paul is the only Republican candidate that thinks 9/11 was America's fault.
  • Only Ron Paul thinks anarchist (and Cindy Sheehan's main squeeze) Screwy Lewy Rockwell is a genius.
  • Ron Paul is the only Republican candidate who teamed up with the detestable Bawney Fwank to gut the military under the direction of Reichsfuhrer $oros's Progressivevik minions.
  • Only Ron Paul thinks legalizing heroin and prostitution are Conservative values.
  • Ron Paul is the only Republican candidate who's as vile as Mitt Commie and former Obama sycophant Jon Huntsman.
  • Only Ron Paul is willing to be seen with Space Man Dennis Kucinich in public.
  • Ron Paul is the only Republican candidate who would not have gone to war with Nazi Germany to "save the Jews".
  • Only Ron Paul thinks accepting money from Stormfront is a good idea.
  • Ron Paul is the only Republican candidate that had his own moonbat newsletter that claimed Mossad bombed the World Trade Center in 1993 and the federal government created the AIDS virus.
Your move, Paultards.........

Wednesday, January 4, 2012

HEY RINOs AND PAULTARDS! IN YOUR FACE, DORKS!

I must say, the 2012 Iowa Caucus was magnificent.


ABSOLUTELY magnificent.


You see, the good guys won for a change.


Mitt Commie failed and Jew hater Ron Paul was delivered a staggering defeat.


Now, before we get started, let's get a few things clear. Number one, I don't shill for candidates. I have my favorite candidate and you have yours. In this column, I will never tell you who to vote for. I will always tell you who I think is pond scum (like Mitt Commie, like former Obama syocphant Jon Huntsman, and last, and certainly least, Stormfront candidate Ron Paul), but I will never tell you who to vote for. (You're an adult, I trust you'll act accordingly.) Number two, I am fully aware that the Iowa Caucus is not that big of a deal. There's no need to remind me of that. (If you don't believe me, ask President Huckabee.)

The failures of Mitt Commie were mind boggling. Here was a guy with a campaign budget that was bigger than the GDP of El Salvador, who had been campaigning since John McLame's whimpering defeat in 2008, and has a cable news station (FNC, aka the Fox Neocon Channel) in the tank for him, and has a super PAC to do his hatchet work for him.......and yet........he barely beat Rick Santorum by 8 votes. Yep, you read that right, 8 measly votes. (It should be noted, that until very recently, Rick Santorum's campaign was being ignored by everyone not named Mark Levin and had 68 cents and pocket lint to its name.) Even uglier for Mitt Commie was the fact that he was unable to drive a wooden stake into the heart of nemesis Newt Gingrich's campaign. Despite being carpet bombed by Romney's PAC hatchet men and operatives, Gingrich placed a respectable fourth and lived to fight another day. In other words---Mitt Commie choked.


Meanwhile, in Red Skull Ron Paul's Fourth Reich, the Paultards are in Judenfrei heaven. They think their Fuhrer has won a great victory over the "neocon bankster Zionist war mongers" by placing third. In actuality, this is a resounding, Stalingrad-like defeat for Herr Doktor. See, Iowa laws allow anyone to change their party affiliation at the door of any caucus and vote. So in theory, every liberaltarian, every Green, every 9/11 Truther, every Neo-Nazi, every malcontent, and every so-called "independent" in the state of Iowa could have showed up and dragged the Surrender Monkey's carcass across the finish line. But they didn't. Despite the "money bombs", the "spamming" of polls, the "trolling" of FRee Republic, making pests of themselves on talk shows, and other Brownshirt-like behavior, RuPaul (H/T: Mark Levin) and his flunkies have failed and failed big time.

Let me repeat: No, I'm not shilling for anyone and yes, I know Iowa's not that big of a deal. However, a win's a win and I'll take 'em any way I can get 'em. If you don't win, you can't keep it classy and say things like this:

HEY RINOs AND PAULTARDS! IN YOUR FACE, DORKS!

Thursday, December 22, 2011

You Might Be A Paultard If....

(With all due apologies to Jeff Foxworthy)




.....You've memorized Ron Paul's economic platform, but your supervisor doesn't think you're ready to man the shake machine yet.

.....You fail a remedial history class at the local vo-tech when every one of your answers on the final exam is "Ron Paul".

.....Your mother calls down to your basement "apartment" to tell you that dinner is ready and you scream back, "I'll eat when I'm ready, you Zionist pig! What's the matter, don't you believe in freedom ?"

.....You think bong water is an acceptable alternative to aftershave.

.....You like to tell people that you're the product of Screwy Lewy Rockwell and Cindy Sheehan's trysts.

.....Your every sentence begins with "Only Ron Paul...." and "Ron Paul is the only....."

.....Code Pinko kicks you out of a rally for being a wuss.

.....You throw darts at a picture of Abraham Lincoln.

.....Your head spins around and you spit pea soup when you're within five feet of a synagogue.

.....You know what Ron Paul's first words were, but you can't remember where you left that last hit of heroin.

.....You're dumb enough to call Mark Levin's show and start a sentence with "Only Ron Paul..." and "Ron Paul is the only...." (Yes, this rates two mentions! It's as annoying as it is intellectualy lazy!)


.....You think burqas are sexy.

Monday, December 5, 2011

Reason # 985-B To Think Ron Paul Sucks

There are many reasons to think Ron Paul is a bottom feeder. He refuses to support a Constitutional amendment to protect normal, heterosexual marriage. He voted to turn the United States military into a San Francisco bath house by repealing DADT. He wants to see drugs and prostitution legalized. He thinks Islamo-Nazi Iran should have a nuclear weapon. He surrounds himself with anarchists like Cindy Sheehan's love slave, Screwy Lewy Rockwell. In general, there isn't a sewer RuPaul (H/T: Mark Levin) isn't too proud to hunt for food in.


Then, there's this. From CBS News:

***********************************

"Libertarian Congressman Ron Paul is breaking with many of his fellow Republicans - among them his son Rand - to support the creation of the planned Islamic cultural center near the former site of the World Trade Center that has come to be known as the 'ground zero mosque.'

In a statement decrying 'demagogy' around the issue, the former Republican presidential candidate wrote late last week that "the debate should have provided the conservative defenders of property rights with a perfect example of how the right to own property also protects the 1st Amendment rights of assembly and religion by supporting the building of the mosque."

'Instead, we hear lip service given to the property rights position while demanding that the need to be 'sensitive' requires an all-out assault on the building of a mosque, several blocks from 'ground zero,' Paul continues.

He goes on to argue that 'the neo-conservatives' who demand continual war in the Middle East and Central Asia...never miss a chance to use hatred toward Muslims to rally support for the ill conceived preventative wars."


http://www.cbsnews.com/8301-503544_162-20014453-503544.html


************************************

Yes, I know this is old news. No, I'm not breaking any new ground here. However, since Ol' Ru is running for President, this crap should be revisited. (Even Howard "YEAAAAAAAAH!" Dean thought this was a bad idea.)

I don't want to get involved in the technical legalities about whether or not this House of Hatred should or should not be built, since the developers don't seem to have the money for Lincoln Logs, let alone building a gazillion dollar insult. That was beaten to death last year and I don't feel like rehashing it. What I want to focus on is RuPaul's detestable attitude on the matter. (Which is eerirly similiar to Chariman Obama's and Nazi Pelosi's detestable attitude on the matter.)

The above snippet shows, once again, that RuPaul is NOT a Conservative, regardless of what his drug addict followers claim. He's basically an anarchist, and this little episode proves it.

Now, before we get started, I think it's appropriate to explain what I mean by anarchist. I'm not talking in this sense of a bomb-thowing V For Vendetta type. I'm talking about someone who believes they have the right to do what they please when they feel like doing it. That's what RuPaul is advocating here. This has nothing to do with "neo-conservative" war mongering or the religious rights of Muslims. (This is a bare-bones explanation of  RuPaul's mentor Murray Rothbard's anarcho-capitalism, which basically states that society should allow individuals to do as they please as long as they can afford to do so.)

A Conservative doesn't believe in any of the above nonsense. A Conservative is a staunch defender of the individual and his rights, but the Conservative also believes in common sense and morality. For example, a Conservative would defend a bar owner's right to allow smoking in his bar, but a Conservative would fight tooth and nail to stop a strip club from opening next to an elementary school or a church. The Conservative fights for limited government, but never for anarchy. The Conservative also believes that while the individual has rights and those rights should be defended at all costs, the individual should use those rights in a responsible manner. In other words, the Conserative may very well want to give the social finger to the driver of a Smart Car with a "Obama 2012" bumper sticker, but he doesn't because he believes in a polite moral society.

Ladies and gentlemen, yes there's a fine line that often gets blurred when it comes to our rights, and I don't claim to have all the answers. But I will tell you this, I sure do understand them better than Ron Paul does.