A Quick Review

Now that the 2012 campaign to unseat America's First Kenyan Communist President is completely underway, I thought now would be great time to review the basics of Conservatism. For some, this is old hat and I apologize for boring you half to death. For others, (and you know who you are) this is what an actual Conservative thinks and believes. (Those of you who fall into the latter category, I believe it will behoove you to take notes. You might learn something.)

A Conservative knows:

• the US Constitution means exactly what it says. The Constitution isn't "living and breathing" and it is a charter of "negative liberties", meaning that Constitution does not limit what the individual can do, it limits what government may do to the individual and states.
• freedom without individual liberty is impossible.
• All Americans have the rights laid out by the Declaration of Independence and the Bill of Rights. Nothing less is needed. Nothing more is needed. Government didn't grant us these rights, our Creator endowed them upon us. A Conservative also knows that since our rights come from our Creator, they can't be taken away by man.
• The United States is a sovereign country that has the right to act as it sees fit on the world stage. A Conservative doesn't believe that the United States has the responsibility to be the world's policeman, but it reserves the right to defend itself from foreign enemies in any way it chooses. A Conservative believes that the United States may ally itself with any other nation and must live up to its treaties. A Conservative also believes that foreign nationals should have no say in American foreign policy.
• the US economy must be free of the shackles of excessive government for two main reasons. The first reason is govenrment can only harm the national economy and the second reason is excessive government leads to crony capitalism, which is the anathema of the free market the Founders envisioned.
• human life begins at conception. There is no Constitutional right to murder the unborn.
• The Founders did not intend for the First Amendment to limit religion. The First Amendment was written to protect religion from the intrigues of government.
• the United States was founded as a Judeo-Christian nation with Judeo-Christian values. It wasn't founded as a secular nation by any stretch of the imagination.
• illegal aliens are criminals and should be treated as such.
• that all attempts to legitimize the homosexual lifestyle are poorly designed social experiments at best and fascist powergrabs at worst.
• the redistribution of wealth is wrong on many fronts. The government should have no say in who has what in legally gained property or wealth.
• the Second Amendment is in place not only to protect one's self from criminals, but also to protect the individual from tyranny, from either invasion or the govenment.
• the government should be slashed back to its Constitutional limits. Too much of the bloated federal bureaucracy is unaffected by elections and is blatantly unconstitutional.

The above is not an ideology. It's not like the Marxism Chairman Obama espouses.There's nothing radical about it. It isn't "fringe" lunacy. This is common sense. The grand majority of Americans believe this, even if they can't articulate it or are afraid to articulate it. The above is also non-negotiable. I won't vote for someone to be dog catcher, let alone President of the United States if that individual disgarees with any of the above. In other words, folks like Myth Romney, Slick Rick Perry, and Jon Huntsman (whoever he is) have irrevocably lost my support and will not, under any circumstances, gain it in the Republican Primary. If Krispy Kreme Christie (H/T Mark Levin) waddles into the fray, he won't get my support either.


Then, there's MoRon Paul.


Not only will I not support Dr. Detestable, I will actively campaign against him. Among all of the Republican candidates, he violates the most of the above stated principles. RuPaul (again, H/T Mark Levin) has stated that 9/11 was America's fault. He disagreed with the elimination of Osama Bin Laden.  He has voted for the repeal of "Don't Ask, Don't Tell".He has made it clear that he despises Israel (on Islamo-Nazi Iran's state run television, no less). He has shown support for the abortion pill, RU-486. One of Ron Paul's mentors, Murray Rothbard, was an anarchist. Paul's svengali, Lew Rockwell, is also an anarchist. Thomas Woods, Paul's pet professor, advocates reinstituting the Articles of Confederation. The Reverend Wright of the Republican Party has considered placing psychotic leftist Dennis Kucinich is his Cabinet. To top it all off, the Bizzare One was the 2009 Earmark King, out earmarking liberal giants like Nazi Pelosi, Pete Starke Naked, and Bawney Fwank. Ron Paul is to Conservative like kitten is to 3-4 run-stopping nosetackle. I'd rather go swimming in a pool full of sharks while wearing a hamburger Speedo than support him in the upcoming primary.


I won't and never will tell you who to vote for in this column. You're an intelligent person and you need no help from me. I will, however, tell you how to vote.


Vote Conservative.

Dr. Detestable

There are a lot of things to detest Ron Paul for. He's gotten an endorsement from the $oros-funded Code Pinko. He's a hero to neo-Nazi organizations like Stormfront. He believes in Murray Rothbard's "anarcho-capitalism" nonsense. He's the Pork King of 2009, out earmarking leftist giants like Steny Hoyer, Nancy Pelosi, and Barney Fwank. Needless to say, there isn't a sewer Ron Paul isn't too proud to hunt for food in.

But it gets worse.


Ron Paul thinks America deserved the horror that was 9/11.


From the demoinesregister.com:

-----------------------------------

“I don’t see Islam as our enemy,' [Ru]Paul said. 'I see that motivation is occupation and those who hate us and would like to kill us, they are motivated by our invasion of their land, the support of their dictators that they hate.'

Regarding 9/11, Paul said that attacks against the U.S. from Middle Eastern groups at home and abroad can be traced to the foreign presence of U.S. troops, as well as America’s relationships with dictator regimes.
Paul referred to a military base in Saudi Arabia, the birthplace of Islam, as a key motivator in the Sept. 11th attacks. Osama bin Laden viewed it as an American desecration of holy land.

'After 9/11, (people said) ‘Oh yeah, it’s those very bad people who hate us,’ but 15 of (the hijackers) came from Saudi Arabia,” said Paul. “One of the reasons they attacked us, is we propped up this Sharia government and the fundamentalists hated us for it.'

The congressman particularly decried U.S.-led bombings in foreign nations, saying that 'almost always those individuals that they are trying to kill did not have any direct relationship' with threats to the U.S."

http://caucuses.desmoinesregister.com/2011/08/27/paul-says-u-s-intervention-motivated-911-attacks/


-----------------------------------


So in other words, Dr. Detestable thinks that the Islamo-Nazis in the Middle East should steer the foreign policy of the United States.


Let's get a few things clear. There are many parts of American foreign policy I don't agree with. For example, I am firmly against Chairman Obama's Libyan Misadventure. (I still have no idea why we're involved or why we're footing the bill.) I am also firmly against giving any sort of aid to the new Muslim Brotherhood fascist regime in Egypt. I wasn't a big fan of sending troops to Haiti in the middle of two wars for disaster relief, nor was I particularly thrilled with sending troops to Bosnia. To me, these are nothing but foreign policy boondoggles at best, and socialism at the very worst, since it involves the redistribution of wealth from the United States to places that either hate us or have been money pits. I also don't believe in "spreading democracy". I think we should fight wars to win them, not recreate societies. Not one taxpayer penny should go to rebuilding Iraq or Trashcanistan. Personally, I could care less if Iraq or Trashcanistan  ever become functioning democracies. It's none of my business nor is it my problem. The taxpayer shouldn't be on the hook for nonsense like that.


However, despite what Dr. Detestable thinks, these are decisions that We the People get make with our votes. They the Islamo-Nazis don't have a say in the matter. We can't allow ourselves to be bullied by these raving lunatics. In order to survive, the United States must have free reign to do what is in its best interests. If that means going against the UN (which we should not be a member of), so be it. If that means Ali Kaboom gets upset by it, too bad. The United States is a sovereign nation that has the right to do what it sees fit to protect itself and its people.

Freedom isn't free, folks......

Reverend Jeremiah RuPaul

If you're still on the fence about the lunatic fraud known as Ron Paul, watch these three videos in order.

I rest my case. Hat Tip: Mark Levin

Why I Despise The RuPaulista SS

There are many reasons not to like Ron Paul's supporters, the RuPaulista SS. Many are neo-confederates who think the Articles of Confederation are superior to the Constitution. Many are neo-Nazis, who conveniently forget that the word "Nazi" is short for National SOCIALIST German Workers Party. (It should be noted that the Nazis themselves referred to themselves as "National Socialists".) Many are vicious antisemites. Many use the word "imperialist" when describing the US.

As sleazy as the above is, there is one big reason I despise the RuPaulista SS: The grand majority of them are sheeple. They are unable to think for themselves. They attempt to tear down any and all who get in their way or criticize Ron Paul or his svengali, Lew Rockwell. The majority of them think the same, act the same, and say the same.

In other words, the majority of them are like the Obama Drones that spread across the US like locusts back in '08.

Just like the Moveon.Dork crowd in '08, the RuPaulista SS of 2011 hangs on their Fuhrer's every word, regardless of how moronic it sounds. For example, if you criticize RuPaul for going on Iran's Islamonazi state-run television station and attacking the United States, most RuPaulistas will tell you (after calling you a "neocon") that such a heinous act was an act of patriotism. It's the same kind of warped behavior that the Obama Drones displayed in 2008. (Who could forget catch phrases like "dissent is patriotic" and "speak truth to power" ?) These people aren't supporters of a political party or a certain candidate. They're a mob.

As Ann Coulter wrote in Demonic:

---

"Everything else changes, but mobs are always the same. A mob is an irrational, childlike, often violent organism that derives its energy from the group."

[To be fair: The RuPaulista SS has never been accused of violence. I'm sure if you take their bongs from them, things could get ugly, but there are no recorded instances of them being violent.]

---

In my humble opinion, following any politican blindly is un-American. (Even George Washington had his critics.) For example, I greatly admire Ronald Reagan, but I think his amnesty plan was an utter disaster. (Reagan himself later admitted that it was a horrible mistake.) Does that make me any less of a Reaganite ? No. It makes me more of a Reaganite, since I'm following his advice: "Trust, but verify." The same goes for the glitterati of the Conservative Movement. I'm a big Ann Coulter fan, but I wasn't exactly enthralled with the way she attacked "birthers". I agree with some of what Pat Buchanan says, but sometimes I think what he writes is slop. The same goes for Mark Levin, Sean Hannity, Glenn Beck, and Ayn Rand. I'll grant you that it doesn't happen very often, but it does happen. I'm an individualist, first and foremost. I agree because I choose to agree on the basis of logic, not emotion.

Can the 2+2=5 Leftists and the Rupaulista SS call themselves individualists ? Nope.

And that's why I despise them.

Who's Crazier Ron Paul Or His Looney Tune Supporters ?

Ron Paul is a whack job, but are is his cyberstormtrooper supporters even crazier than him ? I report, you make a rational decision.

---

---

"I wonder if there is a way to get Dr. Paul's book to Mr. Farrakhan to read. If he likes what he reads we could join forces to liberate all people from the genocide that the elite have planned. Just my two cents."

http://www.dailypaul.com/56948/does-louis-farrakhan-sound-like-ron-paul-videos

---

"I'm not going to castigate you for disagreeing with me, like the Hebrews on here do. Everyone is entitled to their opinion and I respect that.

I was merely quoting Ron Paul. Paul said that Israel has over three hundred nuclear weapons and four other countries in the region also have nuclear weapons. Why can't Iran have them? Ron Paul doesn't fear Iran and neither do I. Ron Paul's political philosphy parallels Pat Buchanan's. Our focus has always been on Pat Buchanan for president. Since Pat no longer has political aspirations we are supporting the Ron Paul candidacy."

http://www.humanevents.com/article.php?id=45554

---

"Warmonger Romney has four strapping Mormon sons who wouldn't die for Israel personally in a million years. Heck, they won't even go chill out in the green zone for a couple of months like the ones Palin and Biden are pretending to sacrifice to Moloch. Getting limbs blown off so the poor wittle Iswaelies don't have bad dweams worrying about that mean old existential thweat is for Gentiles, not Mitt and the boys.

Ron Paul will get assaulted by every special interest group in the country, except military vets, who support him more than any other candidate. I figure The Federal Reserve goons will [try to assassinate] or a heart attack if the Hasbarat Media can't do the deed.

Still, Paul is the only sane choice. I'd rather support somebody who could actually help the country."

http://www.humanevents.com/article.php?id=45554

---

I'll ask you again, Tea Party Patriots, 9/12 Project, FReepers, and anyone else who is interested in preserving the Republic:

Is this who you stand with, in any way, shape or form ? Did the Tea Party begin to support antisemites ? 9/11 Truthers ? A nuclear Iran ? National SOCIALISM ? McGovernite foreign policy ?

Ron Rupaul and his cyberstormtroopers do not, in any way, shape, or form represent the Tea Party Movement. We don't wear swastika armbands or white hoods.

We are the antithesis of this crap.

A Vote For Ron Paul Is A Vote For Socialism

Some of my regular readers will wonder why I'm wasting my time with Ron Paul. After all, ol' RuPaul is nothing but a piker, and our eyes should be on the prize--- the White House in 2012. This would be a fair assessment----if one only looks at the small picture.

I am fighting for the soul of the Conservative Movement. I'm heading off RuPaul and his cyberstormtroopers at the pass before they irrevocably damage the Movement. If the Conservative Movement is destroyed, all hope is lost. The Republic will not survive. It's that simple. It's that cut and dried.

I'll be damned if I'm going to just sit back and just let that happen. Just like I won't go down without a fight against Chairman Obama and his Democrat Party drones, I'm not going down without a fight against RuPaul and his cyberstormtroopers, either.

See folks, regardless of what you've read about RuPaul, s/he's NOT a Conservative. S/he's NOT a Libertarian. S/he's is nothing but another leftist who seeks to destroy the Republic and the Constitution.

You heard it first, here folks. Ron Paul is a socialist. There I said it! And guess what ? I ain't takin' it back, either. RuPaul is a leftist socialist pig.

You better be able to prove this, Neocon.

Not a problem. As always, I bring facts to the party. You won't find any Chris "I'll Have Another Drink" Matthews-like reporting here. I don't sing it, I bring it.

Let's take a stroll down Memory Hole Lane, shall we ? Check out the video below, and make sure you watch the crawl on the bottom:

---

---

Maybe my copy of the Constitution is wrong, but I just can't seem to find the section where Congress has the Enumerated Power to fund crap like a "drop out reduction program" or rehab centers. Now ladies and gentlemen, is that not a redistribution of wealth ? Is that not taking money from Citizen A by FORCE and giving it to Citizen B ? (To be fair: RuPaul was 1000% right about rebuilding Iraq's infrastructure. However, just like I don't want to pay for Iraq's crap, I don't want to pay for infrastructure projects in Galveston, Texas if I don't live in Galveston, Texas.)

The most troubling thing about that video is the fact that RuPaul thinks that the boondoggles he funded in 2009 are "tax rebates". Call me crazy and off my meds, but I'm one of those old fashioned types who believes that a tax rebate occurs when the taxpayer gets to keep the money he slaved away for. The very fact that he used the words "tax rebates" for public spending is telling and rather troubling. It's a clear signal that RuPaul is a collectivist with some serious socialist tendencies.

Another thing that's extremely troubling about this video is the fact that RuPaul seems to believe that Representatives are genies that grant their constituents' every wish. They aren't. We're not a democracy, we're a Republic. Now, I'm not saying Congress should act like dictators like when Nazi Pelosi ran the joint. Representatives should listen to the constituents on national issues, like when the entire nation screamed bloody murder about Obamacareless. However, "build this, gimme that" requests should be ignored since it's corrupt vote buying at its best and Marxism at its worst.

If RuPaul was the Pork King of 2009, it means he outearmarked the following big spender commie rogues:

Nazi Pelosi (S-CA)

Charlie "Taxes ? What Taxes ?" Rangel (S-NY)

Barney Fwank (S-MA)

Anthony's Weiner (S-NY)

Ren N'Steny Hoyer (S-NY)

Pete Starke Naked (S-CA)

Ed Mah-key (S-MA)

If you're outporking these Marxist-Leninists, how on God's green and cooling Earth can you possibly have the nerve to lecture anyone on fiscal responsibility ? Buehler....Buehler.....Anyone ? Anyone ?